Author

Darcy Smith

Darcy Smith has 258 articles published.

Organic Stories: Gambrinus Malting, Syilx and Secwepemc Territory

in 2024/Current Issue/Marketing/Organic Community/Organic Stories/Spring/Summer 2024

Meet the Middle Man in Your Beer

Darcy Smith

As varied and innovative as craft beer has become over the last decades, it ultimately still comes down to four main ingredients: water, hops, yeast, and, of course, malt—I had never really thought much about malt until I found myself peppering Ken Smith of Gambrinus Malting with questions I didn’t even know I had.

Hops may have charmed us thanks to cute leaves and a habit of trailing their greenery up the sides of craft breweries everywhere. Yeast and water, a bit of a given? But malt is the ingredient that goes through the biggest transformation before it becomes beer. There’s a whole world of farming, science, and craft that goes into making the malts that make beer possible.

Gambrinus Malting was founded in 1992 when the original (German-but-living-in-the-Okanagan) founder decided to ship a decommissioned malthouse from Germany to Armstrong, BC and put it back together—because, according to him, Germans make the best beer in the world, and the best malt.

The intervening decades have brought growth, improvements, and even a buyout, and Ken now calls the malthouse a “German-inspired Canadian malthouse,” which continues to use the saladin-style germination vessels used in making old-world malts, and produces about 16,000 metric tonnes of malt annually. To this day, Gambrinus’ German style malt makes a pilsner that is considered the closest thing to a German pilsner that North Americans can make, even allowing one of Gambrinus’ customers to take gold in the most prestigious global pilsner award. That award? You guessed it, it usually goes to the Germans.Award-winning pilsners aside, Gambrinus also has a line of organic malt products, for which the beer world can thank Rebecca Kneen and Brian MacIsaac at Crannóg Ales. Long-time Gambrinus customers, Rebecca and Brian petitioned the maltsters (yes, that is the technical term for a maker of malt) to start offering an organic line of products which has only grown as word got around. When Gambrinus was acquired by Rahr Malting in 2017, the new parent company saw fit to grow Gambrinus’ line of organic products, focusing mostly on pale ale and pilsner malts that they provide to breweries and distilleries.

The German-inspired Canadian malthouse. Credit: Maylies Lang.

Rahr Malting is another malting company that can call on tradition—and German origins—for its professional chops. The Minnesota-based family-run business has been around for 177 years. “They’ve been through prohibition and a couple world wars,” Ken says, “and they’ve managed to persevere.” When they brought Gambrinus into the fold, they wanted to take what had been developed over 25 years and “build on what was created to turn it into something special, without removing any ties to the current community, branding, and history.”

That “something special” starts out as a raw ingredient: “barley is the typical ingredient,” Ken says. “But you can malt almost anything, from corn, to oats, to rye, it all depends on the needs of the market.” Gambrinus does mostly barley, with a bit of oats, rye, and wheat, grown on BC and Alberta farms. Everything from varietal to protein content to moisture can impact the malt so maltsters are particular about their ingredients.

Once the barley arrives at the malthouse, it is cleaned and steeped. The moisture content jumps from about 12 to 40 percent. Next up is germination in those saladin-style boxes. “The germination process is where most of the magic happens,” says Ken. “We sprout the barley to the point that we’re satisfied that it will meet the enzymatic requirements of the brewhouse, then we want to lock in all that goodness so we take it to the kiln.” Beer contains enzymes that convert the starch in malt into sugars, a process which starts during germination. Kiln-drying suspends this process at the right moment, while adding some flavour and colour and bringing the moisture down to four and a half to five percent. “It’s now malt, not barley anymore,” Ken says.

This 5,000-year old process “is incredibly scientific nowadays, with huge investments into different sensors, trending, and monitoring,” Ken says. “It is unbelievably challenging to make a consistent product when the inputs are changing daily. The barley will show up and react differently in the malthouse, but the legit expectation from customers is that we make a malt that is consistent and reliable.”

It’s not just the barley: “Water is paramount to success,” says Ken. It’s one of the hardest things they deal with each year, how much water to use, how warm it needs to be, and when to apply the water—especially during steeping and germination. “If we get that wrong, the finished product won’t be where we want it to be.”

Malt making requires “an incredible amount of testing from the moment the grain is selected from the farm field all the way along until it leaves for the customer.” What are those tests looking for? “Everything. Protein, enzymes, colour, to name a few. Depending on the product, there are an array of sensory decisions to be made,” Ken says. “Analytics become core for decision-making as maltsters.” Pilsners, for example, require a lighter product (a one point five to one point seven on their colour scale), while darker beers such as munichs can be in the 30-plus range.

Monitoring and decisions are happening on a daily basis, and experience helps, Ken says: “We take each batch and accumulate that data.” But then they get the next year’s shipment of barley: “Every crop year resets us. We can build on experience over decades, but the grain coming in each year is different. In drought season, we might have smaller kernels; in a cooler year, more plump.”

Ken is particularly excited about Gambrinus’ just-launched IPA malt, “a malt-forward, light-coloured, single-ingredient malt which is primarily used for west coast and hazy IPAs” These beers are distinctive to this region, and, Ken says, “we are trying to simplify ingredients for brewers and give them something new.” Ken first figured out this “super delicious” IPA malt would be his new favourite when he found himself enjoying drinking the wort in the laboratory. “The one thing you can’t really automate is sensory testing: taste and smell. You still need humans to test that,” Ken says. “Every day in the lab, when we process the malt in order to get all this data, we do something called a wort.” When brewing beer, wort is the liquid that comes from the mashing process, before it goes to fermentation and becomes alcohol. “We take the malt to wort. Then we can taste that liquid and compare sensories.” They do it in teams of at least five or six each day to make sure the products taste and smell how they want them to—no doubt a coveted role.

Rigorous testing is an essential part of modern-day malting. Credit: Maylies Lang.

When not tasting wort, Ken is the director of operations at Gambrinus. He is “responsible for the overall human and financial health and safety of the organization,” he says. He comes with a background in software design, data analytics and business: “my initial role was to help with the modern transition to using more technology,” and while somewhere along the way he fell in love with malting, he speaks with equal passion about the people who make the malt.

Gambrinus’ safety program—safeguarding the people making the malt—is Ken’s baby. When he first joined the company, he redeveloped it from the ground up, once he reckoned with how inherently dangerous any production facility can be: “there’s a million things that can go wrong, from chemicals to large augurs to forklifts and moving vehicles.” Ken says that Gambrinus “has been recognized on a provincial level a couple times now for contributions to safety in food manufacturing.” There’s plenty to celebrate there, including being the first malting company to achieve the Occupational Safety Standard of Excellence.

Ken lives and breathes safety not just within the walls of Gambrinus, but along the whole supply chain. Organic certification might have started out as an answer to a specific customer need, but for Ken it’s answered a number of other needs too. “The organic regime requires you to consider all elements of risk, from customer interaction to procurement traceability to inventory and quality management and more,” Ken says. He digs organics so much that he’s now on the board of the Pacific Agricultural Certification Society (PACS). “I’m passionate about it,” he says. “Organics is important to consumers maybe for different reasons than it’s important to manufacturers.” For Ken, “It’s accountability right from the farm field to the final product.”

He sees a future where more producers are growing organic grain destined for more organic maltsters, and then, of course, for more organic craft beers. It’s in part why he got involved with PACS: “most of the people involved are producers. There are not very many processors on boards, looking at organics from a manufacturing and distribution element.”

He names Fieldstone Organics, another Armstrong-based producer, as a community champion. Through their events, he’s been able to see the community come together. “There’s just so much passion and commitment to community in organics.” For Ken and Gambrinus, there is more to organics than just economics. It’s about sustainability and sustainable food practices. “It makes communities better, and the food chain more reliable,” Ken says.

Barley on conveyer belt. Credit: Maylies Lang.

Speaking of making communities better, for Gambrinus, “the future is about doubling down on our commitment to employees, community, and product.” The craft beer industry is changing as people’s tastes and habits change. Ken names a few shifts: people under 30 “have really slowed down on alcohol consumption,” is one. Another is “tastes shifting to ready-to-drink options that aren’t craft beer.”

Gambrinus is adapting and evolving with the rest of the sector, launching new products, including the previously-mentioned “super delicious” IPA. The small-batch nature of Gambrinus makes for excellent testing ground, and Gambrinus has released three new products in recent years. Non-alcoholic beer has started to catch up with the rest of the craft beer market, and Ken sees potential in that realm. But he says maltsters “are the grandpa in the whole thing. The brewers are the cool kids with skateboards, they’re the ones reacting to changes and recognizing changing habits, and coming to us and saying we need this to meet this need.”

Ultimately, Ken sees a lot of opportunity for organics in the beer world: “I want to better understand the industry and see how we can encourage more people to consider organics. It turns out some of the most passionate people in the world are involved in organics, and now I’m passionate too.”

PS: If you have spent your time reading this article wondering how Gambrinus got its name, we have something in common. At the end of my conversation with Ken, I finally asked about the name. Gambrinus is named after “a mythological story about a guy named King Gambrinus, who sold his soul to the devil to become the first immortal brewer.” When the devil came to claim his soul, he outdrank the devil, thus keeping his soul, impressing the people so much they crowned him King Gambrinus, and eventually ending up on a sign outside of a re-constructed German malthouse in a charming little valley.

Darcy Smith is the editor of the BC Organic Grower, and a huge fan of organic farmers. She also manages the BC Land Matching Program delivered by Young Agrarians.

Featured image: Hands holding barley grains at Gambrinus Malting. Credit: Maylies Lang.

Biodynamic Farm Story: In Which Chickens Cause Compost Problems

in 2024/Crop Production/Current Issue/Land Stewardship/Organic Community/Preparation/Spring/Summer 2024/Standards Updates/Tools & Techniques

Anna Helmer

I guess everyone knows the main claim to fame of a perfectly-run Biodynamic farm is that it is a closed loop system. Everything needed by the farm is produced within the farm. Going outside the gate, especially for fertility, indicates a problem with farm health. Biodynamics, and particularly the preparations, are intended to help re-balance the farm system.

A closed loop farming system is a lofty goal. There is apparently little public glory in success, and there may be scant time left over for self-promotion on social media. How would we even know these farms exist? I am betting they don’t do social media. Social media may be an unbalancing force. I digress.

If only these farmers were writing this article, instead of yours truly with her woefully inadequate Biodynamic credentials. You seem to be stuck with me, however, as I keep saying yes when asked.

I am strongly motivated by the belief that way too many of our farm dollars flow off the farm and I think Biodynamics can help with that. As you know, I am low on the learning curve and not moving quickly—there is little risk of disconnect with non-Biodynamic farms. Try to keep up.

Okay. Let’s carry on. I have prepared a meticulous outline for this column. I should experience no difficulty executing the task with vigour, accuracy and just the right number of words.

Au contraire. Not at all. As if.

I have but a starting point and it is this: the chickens are really making a meal of my latest beautiful, Biodynamically-organized compost pile of cull potatoes. I’m generally a supporter of chickens (and their eggs), but in the spring they can really wear out their welcome. In this case, they have all but ruined my compost pile. It looks like a cull potato wasteland.

I may have mentioned (not more than a few hundred times, I am sure), that I have been on a now years-long process of developing a composting regime that deals with all our cull potatoes. My goal has been to emulate cattle, those champions of cull potato processing. In his lectures, Steiner used plenty of bovine analogies to describe the effects of the preparations. In fact, cattle, along with their pasture and the sun, are capable of being part of an exemplary closed loop system.

Why not just get some cows? Too much work frankly, and I am not afraid to say it. I comfort myself with the thought that there are cattle people out there who buy potatoes at the grocery store. We all do the best we can, right?

So, absent cattle, my goal has been to turn cull potatoes into dirt using the Biodynamic compost preparations. It’s a tall enough order. You won’t find potatoes on any list of likely composting stock because they don’t go easy. One of the tricks I have is to try to let as many of the potatoes freeze as possible during the winter. I stockpile the cull potatoes in the cooler as I am sorting and then layer them onto the pile whenever the temperature is below zero.

I stop adding potatoes in April. That’s when I mix it all up and pile it high. In order to give the pile an idea of what’s expected some of the adjacent finished pile is sprinkled on top.

And of course, I add the Biodynamic preparations. The compost preparations are my favourites because they don’t require spraying equipment and endless stirring. I also love the smell of the valerian liquid 507.

They are also my favourites because I can really see their effect, in the form of piles of dirt where once lay piles of potatoes. It’s a profound transformation. I believe I could put an old car in there and confidently expect results.

To return to the chickens. They have been let out of their run for this special two-month period between the end of snow and the planting of the garden. This is an indulgence allowed to them on account of the amazing eggs they produce during this period.

However, the chickens are not respecting my composting program. Since I finished the pile two weeks ago, they have made it part of their daily routine to spend an hour or two scrambling around pecking at what I can only imagine are precious earthworms. Scratch scratch peck peck. They have reduced my plump, proud pile to a flattened, dried, fish-on-a-stick sort of thing.

It’s a very unsatisfactory situation, made especially acute because we recently hosted a Pemberton Farmers’ Institute meeting. Several conventional seed potato growers are part of that group, and they tend to be a little eccentric where cull potatoes are concerned. Cull potato compost piles form no part of conventional seed potato acceptable practices. Cull potatoes are considered a disease source and should be fed to cows or buried in a deep hole.

It was that afternoon, as the chicken crowd departed the compost area and the farmer crowd started arriving, that I realized that the compost pile, located in full view of the parking area, resembled nothing other than a careless deposit of cull potatoes.

Thankfully, I was able to squash potential approbation by presenting our impressive group of special guests from the organic world. My cull potato composting program was not mentioned, the chicken freedom days are soon to be numbered, and I’ll shortly be able to restore the integrity of my compost pile.

Balance emerges.

helmersorganic.com

Anna Helmer farms in Pemberton where she juggles rather than balances. 

Featured image: Rascally chickens looking for trouble at UBC Farm. Credit: Hannah Lewis.

Predator Profiles

in 2024/Crop Production/Current Issue/Grow Organic/Pest Management/Spring/Summer 2024

Linda Edwards

[Editor’s note: As of 2024, Organic BC is more than three decades in the making, and younger sister the BC Organic Grower is on it’s 27th volume! What better time to look back on some original content from the early days of this magazine? Read on for an early-2000’s series on predator insects by Linda Edwards.]

Fly Away Home: Lady Bug Beetles (Coccinellidae)

First published in Summer 2001 (Vol 4, no 3)

Lady bug beetles are probably the best known and most appreciated, if not loved, of all insects. The adults come in many sizes and colours—pink, red, yellow, and orange. Some have no spots and others have as many as 19. These adults over winter in groups under rocks, fallen trees, and in hollows in hillsides and mountainsides. Their bright yellow, spindle-shaped eggs are laid end up on leaves, in clusters of 10 to 30.

The egg clusters are similar to those of their much less popular cousins, the Colorado potato beetle. However, you will find potato beetle eggs only on potato and nightshade plants and rarely are aphid populations high enough on these plants to attract lady bugs to stay long enough to lay eggs. In other words, you are safe to destroy egg clusters you may find on these plants.

In about five days, tiny, bristly black, alligator-shaped larvae hatch out. After they moult, they are grey to blue-grey with purple and orange markings. They feed for about a month and then enter a pupal or resting stage where they become adults in about 10 days. The pupae are immobile, orange-red bumps with black markings that you find attached to everything from bark and leaves to fence posts.

Both the adults and larvae live mainly on aphids. However, they are not very effective at keeping aphid populations from becoming a problem in the first place. Unlike some other predators and parasites, lady bug adults have no special ability to locate their prey. They have to actually bump into something to find it. They also have a short attention span; careful observations (an entomologist’s idea of fun) have shown that if they do not locate prey in 2.5 minutes on a plant they leave, so that low populations tend to escape their notice and therefore control. When there are high populations of aphids, lady bugs do accumulate and are effective in cleaning up infestations. Unfortunately, damage has often already occurred.

One should never use the word “stupid” to describe insect behaviour—though it is tempting when contemplating lady bug larvae. They can be observed wandering aimlessly on the top of a leaf where there are no aphids and never checking underneath where there may be many. Needless to say, survival rate is very low. This, plus the fact that this insect has only one to two generations a year, means the numbers of lady bugs available for biological control is relatively low.

Don’t bother buying ladybugs for control of aphids in a specific situation. The insectaries that sell them, collect them as hibernating adults (usually in Colorado) and keep them cool and dormant until they ship them to you. When you open the container in your garden or orchard, the beetles fly out with only one genetically implanted aim in mind: to fly as far as they can as quickly as they can to get off that mountaintop where they entered hibernation. Flight distances are usually at least half a kilometre and not infrequently much further. Years of research have clearly shown that the only way to keep them where you want them is to put a cage over the plants to be protected.

As you know, damaging outbreaks of aphids in organic production tend to be infrequent. If lady bugs aren’t effective in preventing this from happening, what is? It is the many other less conspicuous predators and parasites. Next issue, I will tell you about one of my favourites—Aphidoletes aphidimyza—the serial killer of the predator world.

The Serial Killer of the Predator World: Aphid Midges (Aphidoletes aphidimyza)

First published in Fall 2001 (Vol 4, no 4)

Most predators kill and feed until satisfied and then rest until they get hungry again. Not Aphidolotes! While a larva can get through a life cycle on as few as six aphids (the only food they eat), if there are more in the vicinity, it will just keep on killing! This ability to survive at low numbers but respond to high numbers is very useful. This means they don’t have to leave an area when numbers drop and can therefore keep resurgences of pests (as can occur with predators like lady beetles) from occurring. It also means because of this tendency to kill as many as possible not just as many as necessary, they can bring high populations of aphids under control more quickly than most of the other predators.

Aphidoletes kill aphids by piercing their victim’s leg tissues and injecting a toxin. This paralyzes the aphid, stopping it from feeding and therefore killing it. Every once in a while, the midge larvae stop and suck out the contents of their prey, leaving behind a black shrivelled body.

This is an indigenous and wide-spread species. The adults are seldom seen, however. They are very tiny, mosquito-like, dark brown, and only fly at night. They feed on honeydew generated by the aphids. Unlike predators like lady beetles, they have wonderful searching ability. An Aphidoletes adult released at the edge of an acre-sized field of plants, with just one plant in the middle with aphids, will find that plant and lay eggs on it. This kind of knowledge is another example of how entomologists like to spend their time!

The eggs—always laid near aphids—look like flecks of paprika. These hatch in two to four days. The larvae, which grow to a maximum of 0.3 millimetres, are bright to pale orange. They are cylindrical and smooth. They too are not easily seen because they are usually under an aphid, killing it. After feeding and growing for one to two weeks (faster in hot weather, slower when it is cool), the larvae drop to the ground and pupate for one to three weeks—again temperature dependent. The adults emerge, lay up to 200 eggs, and the cycle starts over again. There are three to five generations per season, which can result in very high populations. Short days in the fall triggers hibernation. They overwinter as pupae in the soil and leaf litter. It has been documented that there are at least 65 kinds of aphids that this predator will eat. Imagine if you will, years of entomologists searching out aphids and feeding them to Aphidolotes larvae. Yep! They eat that one too!

Such a wonderful predator! So why are there ever outbreaks of aphids anywhere? Their weakness from a growers point of view is that they don’t like cool weather. Their emergence from hibernation is triggered by long day length. They do not start to emerge until around the first week in June. Unfortunately, in many cases, by that time aphid populations may already be high (a good deal if you are an Aphidoletes and possibly why they have selected for late emergence) and be causing damage to crops. The Aphidolotes will become in many cases the most important predator in bringing them under control—but the higher the populations, the longer it will take.

Aphidoletes can be purchased for release. They are the main predator used against aphids in greenhouses so every insectary rears them. You receive pupae in containers. Put them in a warm place out of direct sunlight. Check about every 12 hours. When you see a number of adult “flies” under the lid, take them out and release them into the area where aphids are a problem. Do releases in the evening or very early in the morning before the sun comes up. The adults can dehydrate and die in direct sunlight. After at least most of the adults have flown, put the lid back on, and take it back inside until more adults emerge. Repeat until there are no more. It is okay to tap the side of the container to activate them.

The number you release depends on how much you want to spend, which tends to depend on how bad the situation is. Releases can be very effective especially in places where native populations of Aphidoletes may be low i.e. annual crops or a tree nursery. However, they will not be effective under cool conditions so early spring releases—before naturally occurring ones would emerge—are not recommended. Average daytime temperatures should be above 18 degrees Celsius. There have also been some successes with mid-summer releases, which reduced chronic aphid populations so much that there were very few that were left to over winter and consequently populations were much lower the following year. There have also been releases that made no difference at all. This insect also does not do well under very dry conditions. It is thought that the pupae tend to dry out.

Fair Weather Friends: Green Lace Wings (Chrysoperla cernea and Chrysoperla nigricornis)

First published in Winter 2002 (Vol 5, no 1)

Green lacewings are very good predators, but don’t rely on them to be effective until early summer. There are two main species in BC. Adults of both feed on aphid honeydew and plant fluids. C. nigricornis adults and the immature larvae of both are also predaceous. Aphids are preferred but they will also eat psylla, mites, leafhoppers, thrips, and small caterpillars.

The adults are one of the most beautiful insects—large membranous wings, green bodies, red or gold iridescent eyes, and long fine antennae. They are nocturnal and are often attracted to lights at night. The oval eggs on slender stalks are laid mainly on leaves. They are white at first but turn grey just before hatching. The larvae are mottled yellow, grey, or brown and look like little alligators. They are very active and voracious predators. The larvae form green pupae inside a spherical white cocoon in foliage when they complete their cycle. Egg to adult takes about 30 to 40 days and there are two generations a year.

They overwinter either in the pupae form or as adults in litter, buildings, or under bark. There are relatively few early in the spring so they are not very effective then. The overwintering adults are present but the females do not start laying until night temperatures are warm—usually mid- to late-June.

Lacewings can be purchased from insectaries. However, research has shown that this almost never increases local population. Most of the time, the lacewings arrive as eggs (without their stalks) glued to cardboard. This is the most inexpensive method. However, research and careful observations have shown that the first larva to hatch eats most or all of the other eggs on the cardboard. There are better survival rates from eggs mixed with materials like vermiculite, although at least a third are crushed during the mixing and handling. Larva in individual holders can also be purchased but they are very expensive. Adults are unsuitable because like ladybugs, they tend to fly up to four kilometers as soon as they are released.

Linda Edwards was one of the most influential members of the organic community in BC, and has been greatly missed since her passing in 2020. Linda was a scientist, researcher, and expert in organic fruit trees, and committed organic advocate through her work on the boards of many associations. She also, clearly, loved talking bugs!

Featured image: Lady Bug Beetle. Credit: (CC) Gorupka.

Promising Developments in Robotic Weeding Technology

in 2024/Crop Production/Current Issue/Grow Organic/Spring/Summer 2024/Tools & Techniques

Stacey Santos

The robots have arrived to help with weed management on the farm, but where do you start? How do you know what’s right for your crop, your acreage–and your budget?

Thankfully, a number of options have emerged for managing agricultural tasks with robots, along with a crop of experts who are working on finding Canadians the most promising options for robotic weed control.

In a recent episode of the Organic BC Podcast, host Jordan Marr sat down with two members of Ontario’s AgRobotics Working Group, who explained why robots have become a viable option for farmers, including organic producers in BC who are looking to boost sustainability, soil health, and efficiency on their farms.

AgRobotics Working Group

Since 2021, an AgRobotics Working Group, led by Haggerty AgRobotics and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA), has paved the way for the use of autonomous robots in farming. The group, which also includes growers, grower associations, agri-business, universities and colleges, federal and municipal governments, and technology companies, serves multiple functions, but foundationally it exists to help farmers make smart decisions as they consider investments in tools that can be really expensive.

“We’re trying to basically ground truth so producers do not have to be guinea pigs,” said Kristen Obeid, weed management specialist with OMAFRA and chair of the AgRobotics Working Group. “We want to work out all the bugs first, because this is complicated.”

“We want to deal with challenges that the farmers want us to solve,” added Chuck Baresich, farmer and president of Haggerty AgRobotics. “We look through our network and say, ‘Does anyone have an idea of a solution that may or may not solve that problem? Let’s go test that and see.’”

Why robots, and why now?

Part of the answer is that the technology has developed to the point that some of these tools are just plain good at delivering on what they promised to do, and meanwhile they’re starting to be able to compete on cost with other methods of weed control.

But, there has also been a major development in agriculture that motivated farmers to give these tools serious consideration: herbicide resistance.

“Herbicide resistance is going to be the biggest challenge facing agriculture in the next decade,” said Kristen. “In Ontario alone, we have 23 resistant weed species.”

From a chemical perspective, weed control options are not as available or as effective as what they used to be.

“Resistance is on a trajectory,” Kristen added. “It’s not going away. We need to find different integrated weed management solutions for growers to implement and not continually rely on herbicides.”

But what about good old fashioned mechanical cultivators pulled behind tractors driven by farmers, aided by RTK GPS? Why should farmers consider robots instead of those tools?

Soil damage.

A lot of these robots incorporate artificial intelligence, so they only take out the weeds, with minimal soil disturbance. And, the robots are often lighter than traditional tools, so there’s a lot less soil compaction.

And then, there’s the potential for these robots to save farmers the precious commodity of time when compared to traditional mechanical cultivation.

“That’s where the allure of robotics comes in,” said Chuck. “RTK and auto-steer systems have got pretty good reliability and trustworthiness, and we’re at the state now where we can take that knowledge and move it into an unattended machine.”

Let’s talk about cost

The costs are variable. Kristen and Chuck discussed six robots, and the price varied from $60,000 to a quarter million (CDN), depending on the robot.

What matters most, anyway, is cost effectiveness and value proposition–also difficult to pinpoint because the value of one of these machines really depends on the context of any given farm.

“These robots will never compete against a 120-foot-wide sprayer,” said Chuck. “Where the robots compete is if, say, you’re used to bringing in a manual weeding crew. Or traditionally, when a farmer has to cultivate, they take either themselves or one of their top workers and put them in the tractor. They can be doing something else of more value than sitting in a tractor seat, whether that’s seeding a different crop or monitoring for disease or something else.”

“This robot has nothing else to do, so it actually doesn’t matter that it’s moving slowly, as long as it gets over the field.”

Tools under evaluation

The FarmDroid

One of the tools the AgRobotics Working Group has been evaluating is the FarmDroid, a 900 kg, solar-powered robot that uses a geolocation seeding mechanism to plant in a perfect grid pattern across your farm. Knowing where every seed is, the FarmDroid then weeds that exact same field after planting, before the seeds even come out of the ground.

It’s completely autonomous–it charges itself, runs through the night, and doesn’t require any input from the operator other than if there’s a problem.

The tradeoff for its precision is that the FarmDroid is very slow–its top speed is 0.8 km per hour and it can only handle about eight acres every 24-hour period. If you’re a larger producer and wanted 50 acres of a crop planted on the same day, you’d need multiple FarmDroids running at the same time.

You also need to be cognizant from an operational perspective that you also only have eight acres a day for the weeding process. You need to make sure the field you’re putting it in is appropriately sized so the FarmDroid can get to all the weeds before they grow too large to be taken out.

AgroIntelli Robotti and Naio Orio

The FarmDroid is best suited to higher value horticultural crops like carrots or beets, but is too low to the ground, too small, and too slow to make much economic sense for field crops like soy and corn.

For those kinds of crops, the AgRobotics Working Group has been evaluating different robots, including the AgroIntelli Robotti and the Naio Orio.

These machines are quite similar to each other and can go through crops that are waist high or more, and can do four to six 30-inch rows at a time.

The only difference between the two is that the Naio Orio is an electric robot that can get eight to ten hours per battery charge, and that the Robotti has a little diesel engine that can run for about 60 hours on a tank of fuel.

Both are really precise machines with camera guidance and three-point hitch attachments, so they’ll fit your existing cultivator or other implement. They can also accommodate larger acreage: the Orio can keep a 50-acre field under control, while the Robotti is closer to 100 acres.

Nexus La Chèvre

Jumping back to horticultural crops, another interesting tool is La Chèvre (“The Goat”) from Nexus.

La Chèvre has a series of cameras at the front of the machine that are programmed to know what the crop is. If it sees anything that’s not lettuce, for example, it sends a pair of mechanical grippers down to remove whatever the obstacle is.

The real advantage is that this robot can be trained to leave microscopic weeds alone, resulting in less soil disturbance. And, it also has the advantage of being able to pull out slightly larger weeds, which the other systems cannot do.

“Where we’re seeing some interest in a robot like this is from farmers who might set up a herbicide program where they put down some form of residual and then use the robot from that point on to do weed control,” said Chuck. “Generally speaking, they’re trying to get the robot up to five acres in a 24-hour day–approximately three workers worth.”

Options for no till systems

For the most part, the robots that Kristen and Chuck deal with aren’t a great fit for a no-till system, and one of the main reasons is what Chuck calls “trash”—the residual roots, stock and leftovers from the previous crop that plug up the tooling and are too much for the cultivator to deal with.

The AgRobotics Working Group is working on solutions: they have one grower doing a trial with the Robotti in a strip-till system, carrying out traditional spraying in the strips and then using the robot closer to the crop.

They’re also looking at tooling options and moving into alternative technologies, whether it’s laser weeders, spot sprayers, or electrical weeders for a more precise weeding system. But, these systems are much more costly and complicated.

“Again, you talk about trade-offs,” said Chuck. “Nothing is cheaper than a cultivator, and the second you start moving to vision systems, AI systems, cameras, mechanical arms, lasers, whatever it is, all of a sudden it gets very costly, very quickly.”

Robots aren’t magic

While Kristen and Chuck are optimistic about the role these machines can and will play on the farm, they do come with limitations.

For one, your soil conditions have to be such that the robot can accommodate it. For example, in wetter conditions, the FarmDroid operates better and covers more ground on sandier soil than clay.

And then there’s the internet. With all of the RTK GPS technology, you need to be reliably connected at all times, which can be a barrier.

Another hurdle is the investment, which Chuck describes as a tough pill to swallow.

“Most people aren’t rolling around in cash,” he said. “You know they’re sitting there saying, ‘Hey, I already spent my $300,000 or $400,000 on a tractor, or on this piece of equipment, or whatever. And you’re asking me to do that again and abandon my initial investment?’”

“There are very legitimate reasons to be hesitant.”

Adding to the fear is the constant improvement of technology (in five years time, there’s going to be an upgraded version) and questions around the service (if I’m buying a robot from France, what happens if it breaks down?).

But there’s good news: Businesses are popping up across the country that are trying to solve these issues and provide service to producers who purchase the equipment.

Success stories

While there are some considerations to keep in mind, both Kristen and Chuck are extremely optimistic about the potential of these tools. Here are some success stories they observed in their trials:

From Kristen: “In the Holland Marsh area of Ontario, we have a fig leaf that is now resistant to two groups of herbicides that growers use in their carrot and onion production rotation. We’ve had tremendous success with the FarmDroid. We’ve tested in sugar beets, and then this past year we trialed it in onions and again, with great results.”

“The other one that we had last year was planting onions with the FarmDroid and getting a more consistent size of onion sets,” she added.

From Chuck: “One of the other robots we’ve used is called a Naio Oz, and we had a great experience with one of our customers using it to mark out rows of garlic, and then plant the garlic and weed it over the summer. That was a great use case of a scenario where the farmer’s using the robot like an assistant.”

A lot of potential, but beware of the hype

When doing your own research into agricultural robotics, don’t get sucked into the hype around AI and machine learning, even when robotics companies make wonderful claims on their websites.

“Not all of the stuff we’re doing works,” said Chuck. “I’m a very optimistic person and I love the technology, but boy, I don’t want to oversell it.”

“I think the market will pick the winners and the losers, but I think the technology is very, very promising,” said Kristen. “There are still lots of questions and lots of hurdles before there will be widespread adoption. But I think we’re on a good path forward.”

Listen to the full podcast

To learn more about any of the tools discussed here, or to learn more about the AgRobotics Working Group, visit:

AgRobotics Working Group
Haggerty AgRobotics
FarmDroid
Naio Orio
Nexus La Chèvre

This article was funded through Sustainable Canadian Agricultural Partnership, a federal-provincial-territorial initiative.

Opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Government of Canada or the BC Ministry of Agriculture and Food. The Government of Canada, the BC Ministry of Agriculture and Food, and their directors, agents, employees, or contractors will not be liable for any claims, damages, or losses of any kind whatsoever arising out of the use of, or reliance upon, this information.

Stacey Santos is the Communications Manager for Organic BC. She lives, writes, and gardens in the beautiful and traditional territories of the Lekwungen peoples, who are now known as the Esquimalt and Songhees Nations.

Featured image: The Naïo Orio robotic weeder. Credit: Naïo Technologies.

Growing from Little to Big: How Salt Spring Coffee Navigated Growth

in 2024/Current Issue/Marketing/Organic Community/Spring/Summer 2024

Ryan Kilthau

In 1996, founders Mickey McLeod and Robbyn Scott opened a coffee roasting café on Salt Spring Island with the mission of bringing sustainable coffee to their island community. Salt Spring Coffee was born, and the freshly roasted coffee quickly became an island favourite, sparking conversations with customers about coffee quality and sourcing.

In their quest for coffee that was environmentally friendly and fair to farmers, Mickey and Robbyn made several origin trips to Central America and Indonesia, visiting coffee farming communities in Costa Rica, Peru, Nicaragua, Sumatra and Uganda. Together, they built long-term, direct trade partnerships with coffee producers, who not only shared their hospitality but also shared their generational expertise in organic coffee production and regenerative agricultural practices.

As a result, Salt Spring Coffee became one of the first 10 companies in Canada to be Fair Trade Certified. Since committing to fair trade, Salt Spring Coffee has contributed millions in fair trade premiums, which are additional funds paid directly to coffee farmers who decide on how to reinvest the money within their communities.

Growth

Growth began organically. In the 90’s, it was common for coffee traders to sell coffee based on quality score with little connection to the farmers who produced it. However, Salt Spring Coffee’s direct trade partnerships contributed to a richer understanding of both green bean quality and coffee production. The result was an exceptional cup of coffee with a relationship to coffee farmers that resonated with consumers, and the demand for Salt Spring Coffee’s organic, fair trade coffee grew.

A year after the café opened, Salt Spring Coffee became among the first certified organic coffees in Western Canada to be sold in grocery stores.

Bug Baker and Jodi Dueck roasting coffee at Salt Spring Coffee in Richmond. Credit: Salt Spring Coffee.

Overcoming Challenges

The café on Salt Spring Island quickly outgrew its coffee roasting capacity. The 7.5 kilogram coffee roaster was upgraded to a 30 kilogram roaster, but it wasn’t enough to keep up with demand. Mickey and Robbyn drew up plans to build a coffee roasting and education facility on Salt Spring Island, but after several months of planning, the zoning application was denied. A new space was found on the mainland, and in 2010, Salt Spring Coffee expanded roasting operations to Richmond, BC.

New operations meant expanding the family run business and growing the team. Salt Spring Coffee’s commitment to making a positive social and environmental impact was just as important to internal operations as it was to the coffee supply chain, and in 2010, Salt Spring Coffee became B Corp Certified.

Future

With a growing company, it was more important than ever to Mickey and Robbyn to go, beyond sustainable, to regenerative agricultural and social practices. In 2024, the Salt Spring Coffee team worked together with the Regenerative Organic Alliance, ROA, and coffee producers to launch Canada’s first Regenerative Organic Certified® coffee.

Regenerative organic certification sets the highest standard in the world for soil health, ecosystem preservation, and farmworker fairness. For a farm or product to be Regenerative Organic Certified®, it must first meet USDA organic requirements. From there, additional rigorous standards must be met including sustainable agricultural practices, animal welfare protections, and social responsibilities including supporting the wellbeing and livelihoods of farmers and workers.

Regenerative organic certification provides a holistic framework that ensures communities and ecosystems flourish throughout the coffee supply chain, from crop to cup. At Salt Spring Coffee, it’s another step forward in their mission to change the world for the better.

saltspringcoffee.com

Ryan Kilthau is senior marketing manager at Salt Spring Coffee. He’s an avid coffee drinker and enjoys sailing the BC coast including Salt Spring Island.

Featured image: Mickey with coffee farmers Byron and Sara Corrales. Credit: Salt Spring Coffee.

Farm Water Resilience

in 2024/Climate Change/Current Issue/Grow Organic/Spring/Summer 2024/Water Management

Andrew Bennett

How resilient is your farm to the boom and bust of water extremes, and how can you improve?

For many, the first thought is better irrigation equipment. The main reason farms call me is for water plans to get funding for upgrades. You know the problems: patchworks of old mismatched nozzles, pipes that leak or don’t release air, high maintenance intakes and filters, low pressure slop and high-pressure mist, clogged drippers, wet spots, dry spots, and so on.

Fixing these problems is important. Water must be applied evenly to the crop’s roots at a known application rate or else you’re guaranteed to waste water.

Others want a total overhaul to increase irrigation efficiency and effectiveness, and to reduce labour. They’re making the move to automated solid set sprinklers, low pressure pivots, booms, microspinklers, or drip. Again, great plans.

Scheduling, however, often gets completely ignored. Proper timing has the potential to improve efficiency more than any equipment fix, but very few farms have a reliable method to match water application to the weather, the soil, and their crops’ changing needs.

But let me back up a step further. Before we consider new equipment or tackle questions like whether your wheelmove cycle ping pongs the crop between flood and drought (it often does), let’s begin with fundamentals: How secure is your access to water in the first place?

Where does your water come from? Do you have more than one source? Are they clean, reliable, and viable, and for how much of the season?

What would happen if your watershed were logged or burned, shredding the “ecosystem sponge” of wetlands and deep soils that normally mete out water through the summer?

What would you do if your aquifer were contaminated, or if snowpacks were low, spring came on fast, creeks slowed early, and drought set in?

Can your farm capture the water that falls on your land from snowfall or a big storm? (That water is yours to use, no license required!) Or does it erode soil, puddle and drown plants, leach nutrients and, worse than useless, flush away?

Who controls your water? Are you licensed for the full amount you require, or do you need to apply for a new license? Do other water users have precedence over you? Did you get that well licensed? Are you part of a water system and subject to their infrastructure, governance, priorities, and restrictions (whether you agree with them or not)?

Further upstream, all water sources are tightly linked to, and depend upon, ecosystems that have vital water requirements. BC’s water managers will tell you that many sources have been over-allocated to irrigation licenses, making future restrictions almost inevitable. Is your license at risk of being curtailed in a drought?

Globally, the toxic combination of corporate greed and political misinformation has left international co-operation on climate change in tatters. What will happen in your region as Earth’s average temperature soars above the fabled 1.5°C goal to 3°C and beyond?

Every fractional increase in global temperature represents an unfathomably large increase in the energy held by our atmosphere and oceans, and manifests (among many effects) as extreme and unpredictable weather. Make no mistake, as our planet hurtles towards an uncertain future, farms are on the front lines.

In 2023, Amara Farm increased the capacity of their dugout to increase water security. Credit: Amara Farm.

This may sound like doom and gloom, and it is, but there are good strategies and solutions. As the crux arrives, we’ll all depend on farms and working together in communities more than ever before. We have the know-how, we have the tech, so it’s time to get ready.

For your community to ride this wave, survive, and hopefully thrive, it starts with clear-eyed attention to the facts on your land, a willingness to consider new ideas, and the tenacity to do what it takes—time, money, and sweat—to build your farm’s resilience to the many unwelcome scenarios we might face.

At the very core of resilience, farms must look critically at their water supplies and demands. In my work as a farm advisor, irrigation designer, and water planner, I’ve had the opportunity to visit many farms and help find solutions. Every farm’s needs and circumstances are unique, but I’ll take a stab at some universal truths…

Build Soil

Soil is every farm’s primary water storage. When the tap turns off, you’ll ride out what you’ve stored in your soil. A compacted hard-pan might not store any water at all. A foot deep of thoroughly wetted sand might only have half an inch of water available to plants.

But the same sand—after years of growing the roots of cover crops and filled with worm-chewed mulch, livestock leftovers, and the carbonaceous crud of generations of thriving microorganisms—might have one to one and a half inches of available water in each foot of soil.

Like magic, the same soil life processes can also improve poorly drained soils high in clay or silt, and make both water and nutrients more plant-available.

Deep roots help too. If a foot of soil holds an inch of water, an acre holds 100 cubic meters (26,000 gallons). If you grow plants that send dense roots to four-feet deep, multiply by four!

Shape Your Land

Many of us farm on slopes and should shape the land to catch runoff. Consider terracing or other earthworks designed to slow, sink, and store water, while at the same time improving access and operations. As with all excavation, be very picky to peel off all the topsoil first, and sprinkle it loosely back on top at the end.

If you have space, build water storages. You can get some costs funded, including engineering for dams, a water management plan to map out the big picture, and help apply for the water license amendments you’ll require.

Think big: an acre of farmland might require from 1,000 to 5,000 cubic meters of water in a season, depending on the crop, the microclimate, and the efficiency of the irrigation system. About 2,000 cubic meters is typical, or 10,000 50-gallon rain barrels!

Storage requirements depend on when water is available. If you only have access to the spring freshet, you’ll need to store every drop, plus more to account for evaporation and seepage. But if you have access to a steady low flow all season long, then you only need storage to meet the deficit in peak season.

Farms often don’t want to give up “productive land” for a reservoir or, as I prefer, a constructed wetland. That’s fair, but if your alternative is no water at all, dryland agriculture in much of BC is hardly productive. Where I work in the southeast, well-managed dryland typically produces less than one tonne of hay per acre. A half or quarter tonne is quite normal. Give that land regular water and enough fertility, and you will likely exceed 5 tonnes per acre.

And let’s keep reminding our regulators: When farms grow 10 times more biomass, that’s 10 times more carbon sequestration, some of which is locked in longer term soil storage. Time for carbon credits yet?

Assess Your Irrigation

There are so many ways to waste water. A good bet is to get an assessment by a certified irrigation designer and discuss options with them. You can use your Environmental Farm Plan to get an irrigation or water management plan 100 percent paid for by the government’s Beneficial Management Practice program.

An aside: there are not nearly enough qualified water planners, and very few are independent of a supply company. If you’ve got the chops, consider a career as a professional agrologist (BCIA) and/or irrigation designer (IIABC).

Physical upgrades can be costly, and sticker shock often delays or kills good projects. But better irrigation systems don’t just save water. They should also pay back in higher yields of higher quality crops, all with less labour and maintenance. Centre pivots that replace wheelmoves, for example, usually pay back in about five to 10 years.

If that doesn’t balance the books for you, the business case is clinched if you can get some of your project funded.

Scheduling, by contrast, is totally free and absolutely critical, so make sure you ask your designer for a method to assess your crop, soil, and weather to get the right amount of water to your crop at the right time. There are also plenty of free online resources, including some factsheets and videos I’ve produced.

Monitor Your Irrigation

Finally, you can’t manage what you don’t know. If no weather station near you reliably measures evapotranspiration (see farmwest.com) then install one. Install soil moisture sensors to know if your irrigation schedule needs a tweak. Install a flow sensor to know how much water your system uses when it’s in good shape, and to tell you when it’s clogged or leaking. The sensor can also track how much water your crops actually use through the season. And yes, you can get all that funded too.

This may sound like a lot of work, and it is, but it’s worth it. For too long we’ve treated water as cheap and easy. The time has come to value water for what it is: the essential basis for all life.

Additional Resources:

Five factsheets and four farm case studies (2023)

Twelve short videos (2022)

Four webinars with Bruce Naka (2021)

Environmental Farm Plan

Kootenay & Boundary Farm Advisors

Andrew Bennett, MSc PAg CID, works with farms across Southeast BC through the Environmental Farm Plan program, the Kootenay & Boundary Farm Advisors, and other programs to improve water and soil management and to regenerate agricultural landscapes. He and Caley Mulholland run a small farm in Rossland with their three young boys. andrew@livinglands.ca

Featured image: The dugout at Amara Farm increases water security in the face of increasing drought. Credit: Amara Farm.

Meet the Ministry: Leah Sandler

in 2024/Current Issue/Meet the Ministry/Organic Community/Spring/Summer 2024

Emma Holmes

As BC’s organic industry specialist, I have been able to meet many members of our organic community across the province. I also get to collaborate with other experts at the Ministry of Agriculture, and am keen to highlight them and the important work they do, so you can get to know them—and hopefully collaborate with them too! This issue, I interviewed Leah Sandler, who works in the Resource Management Unit on the Environmental Farm Plan and Beneficial Management Practices programs.

Emma Holmes (EH): When did you join the ministry and what is your role?

Leah Sandler: I joined the ministry almost exactly a year ago. I’m coming up on my one-year anniversary. I think it was March 13th.

EH: Oh, congratulations!

LS: Thank you. My role is senior program developer of the Environmental Farm Plan program and the Beneficial Management Practices program.

EH: Where do you hail from? 

LS: I originally come from St. Louis, Missouri, in the Midwest. But most recently, when I moved to Canada, I moved to Vancouver and started with the Kwantlen Polytechnic University (KPU) Institute of Sustainable Food Systems and then transferred from there to this position based in Courtenay.

EH: What did you work on at KPU?

LS: I was the lead organic agriculture researcher and extension officer. I was leading research and extension projects and had a few big, big projects on the go. One was working with the Alaksen Wildlife Reserve, which is on Westham Island and in Delta. That one involved some really interesting work around farming, conservation, and organics. Some other projects include livestock integration into vegetable farming.

EH: Sounds very interesting. 

LS: It was!

EH: How did you get interested in agriculture?

LS: I grew up in a city—St. Louis. My parents and grandparents were big gardeners, with a vegetable garden in the backyard. But I think it stems from just growing up in the Midwest. You’re surrounded by agriculture. I was aware of it in a way that maybe a New York city kid wouldn’t be. I have always liked being outside and doing manual labor. And when I went to university, I didn’t know what I wanted. And my father said, you know, we’ve always been interested in agriculture. Why not that? I was in a school in a rural area, so it had a strong agriculture program and a university farm and all that kind of stuff. So that’s how I started.

EH: How wonderful to have a parent who can reflect your strengths and interests back to you at those critical moments.

LS: Yes, yes, yes. Yeah I remember that conversation.

EH: What were your favorite classes at university?

LS: The one course that really, really stuck out with me was in grad school. I took a course called Plant Water Relations and it was taught by a well-known forest dendrologist. It was an entire semester of how plants use water, starting from the soil, moving through the plant into the air – the soil, plant, air continuum. It was fascinating, it was in-depth plant water relations.

EH: Can you speak a bit to your current projects? 

LS: Yes, one of my main projects is in the Beneficial Management Practices program or BMP for short. Farmers who have completed an Environmental Farm Plan in the past five years can apply for a suite of different practices that would improve the agri-environmental risks on their farms. We’re working on water infrastructure programs within the BMP, so there’s going to be more funding available for farmers to apply different irrigation or water storage facilities on farm.

EH: Can you share a little bit about where you’re based now and what do you do there?

LS: I am based in Courtenay, British Columbia on Vancouver Island. We live in a very beautiful part of the province with access to many, many outdoor things, so that is generally what I like to do. I really enjoy trail running, so I get out on the trail a lot here. I really love to be volunteer farm labour at local farms. There are some different orchards and farms that I like to help out on. I love getting on farm!

EH: If farmers in Courtenay or farther afield want to get in touch, what is the best way for them to reach you? 

LS: Leah.Sandler@gov.bc.ca

Emma Holmes is the Organics Industry Specialist with the BC Ministry of Agriculture and Food. She studied Sustainable Agriculture and Soil Science at UBC, and then farmed on Salt Spring and worked on a permaculture homestead on Orcas Island. She now lives in Vernon and loves spending time in the garden. She can be reached at: Emma.Holmes@gov.bc.ca

Featured image: Photo provided by Leah Sandler.

Biodynamic Farm Story: Where Anna Dreams About Taking Summers Off

in 2024/Crop Production/Grow Organic/Land Stewardship/Organic Community/Organic Standards/Tools & Techniques/Winter 2024

By Anna Helmer

I have hauled out my Biodynamic books to perform my annual winter Biodynamic brush-up. Brush-up isn’t the right term to use because it implies that I once understood it all, and now just need to remind myself of a few things. If only that were the case. No, it’s more of an annual hopeful attempt to comprehend the material. I keep at it because occasionally the penny drops, and I take a satisfying stride up the learning curve. Stride is also too strong a word. Step. Shuffle. Tip toe.
It’s very incremental.

The eight lectures delivered by Rudolph Steiner that form the basis for Biodynamic agriculture were delivered 100 years ago, over the course of 10 days, to a diverse (there were women there) group of (mostly) farmers. They had asked him to help figure out why their farms were struggling. The food didn’t taste as good as before, the animals were not as healthy, and there was an overall dissatisfaction with farm performance. The only thing that had changed was the arrival of commercial chemical fertilizers which made some things (the cash crops) grow like stink.

And what a quality conference Steiner delivered. Drawing on his extensive research into long tradition, modern science, and esoteric spirituality, he presented the idea that a farm can provide its own fertility. The content was both deeply theoretical and intensely practical, and a new way of thinking about soil, plants, and the forces at play between them, took hold.

Back at their farms, the farmers used what they learned, and the results were positive. Yields were strong, the food tasted better, the animals became healthier, and, if Steiner was right about the impact of nutrition on people’s ability to make cogent decisions about the future, everyone got smarter.

Interesting additional fact to consider and one that has totally side-tracked me: this conference happened in June. Over 100 farmers took 10 days off their farms in June to attend a farming conference. This is a preposterous notion for us modern day growers. However, given the results, it could be argued that taking 10 days off in June was a good farming decision that helped build farming businesses.

As a growth move, a farming conference in June would not make anyone’s list. Today’s growth moves involve planting more acreage, hiring more people, diversifying sales channels, and making capital investments. Sales are indeed boosted but the likelihood of time off in June diminishes with every new foot of planting.

Get to the point, Helmer. I am using the fact that once upon a time, tons of farmers took time off in June to learn about Biodynamic farming—arguably the most revolutionary, farmer-empowering, and potentially world-saving farming method ever seen. I am using this fact as a bludgeon to hammer home the point that we have our priorities all wrong and don’t recognize a growth move when we see it.

But I digress. This June rant is tangential to the actual reason I went back to the books: I wanted to brush up on why winter is a biodynamically important time of year for our soil. In the lectures, Steiner suggests that there is very important energetic action taking place down there while all is frozen and snow covered above. Very importantly in winter, the soil is sealed off and protected from the rigorous treatment we farmers mete out during the growing season. Left alone and protected in this way, the earthly energy accumulates and strengthens, balancing with the captured cosmic forces. Evidence of something powerful happening below comes in the first strong greenery of spring: garlic, rye, and nettle pushing up from roots that developed somehow in that outwardly inert ground of winter.

So, what then, are the consequences of a winter like the one we are experiencing right now: no snow, well above zero, and the ground not frozen. At least all the plants are dead. That’s something normal. I am assuming that winter will eventually turn up, but you have to wonder.

We may have to intervene and throw around a little BD500 and BD501. These are preparations used to help to balance the energies in the soil, and I always assumed their use in winter was superfluous to what was happening below. However, if normal winter isn’t going to show up, it may be necessary to rouse ourselves from our own energy balancing activities and do something, biodynamically, in support of soil.


Anna Helmer farms in Pemberton with her family and friends and hastens to add caveats. helmersorganic.com

Featured image: Detail from “Labour and Leisure,” 1938. Credit: Public Domain

The Future of Farming is in Our Hands

in Land Stewardship/Organic Community/Organic Standards

The 2023 National Farmers Union Convention

By Michelle Tsutsumi

I’m still synthesizing all that happened at the 54th National Farmers Union (NFU) Convention in Ottawa and it was a lot! Coincidentally, Rebecca Kneen and I attended as NFU members. I’m grateful that we can continue to percolate on it together and share some of our takeaways here. The NFU is Canada’s national farm organization committed to family farms. Promoting agroecology and food sovereignty, NFU’s work centres farmers, eaters, and the earth, and is embedded in social and economic justice in Canada and internationally (NFU is one of the founding members of La Via Campesina!).

Having followed NFU’s work on farmland access and seed sovereignty for a while, I was not prepared for the range of issues that NFU is open to tackling, nor the intensity of the resolution process. Huge shout out to the resolutions committee that vetted 11 resolutions before the conference and another nine that came in over the span of the three-day convention. As full as the days were, NFU took good care of its members and provided a thorough orientation to the resolution process at the top of day one. I registered too late to be able to vote; however, I learned a lot from witnessing the discussions and navigating how voices were heard from the floor and from online delegates.

Out of the many resolutions that were passed, I was impressed with how bold some of them were. For example, members voted unanimously for the NFU to support Palestine and call for a permanent ceasefire, there was unanimous support for an Indigenous Solidarity Strategy, and unanimous support for advocating that all migrant workers have access to health care upon arrival in Canada. There’s a lot of process here that would be useful to Organic BC in developing its advocacy platforms, with resolutions from members leading to policy development by the organization, then advocacy supporting those policies. It’s engaging, wide-ranging and really gets members involved. The process is very careful and thoughtful. The outcomes are exciting and useful across a wide range of issues.

Woven between resolution sessions were reports and panel conversations on topics such as: Confronting Power, Organizing for Change, and Creating the Future We Want. All of these panels were jam-packed with relevant information. A standout talk was given by Gabriel Allahdua, a former migrant farm worker from St. Lucia who is currently an Outreach Worker with migrant workers across Ontario and author of the book Harvesting Freedom, which was released this year (I read it on the plane to Ottawa and highly recommend it). The single most important action he urged is to give migrant workers status, so that they are eligible for the same protection as all other Canadian workers. This is an excellent starting point for Organic BC’s own policy for advocacy on migrant workers.

The keynote was given by Fatima Syed, an award-winning climate journalist with The Narwhal, and she provided a detailed overview of what happened in Ontario over the past few years in relation to the greenbelt. All I can say is thank goodness for dedicated investigative journalism! Ontario is losing 319 acres of farmland—every day. Without the investigative journalism, Ontario would be losing a significant portion of the greenbelt in addition to that. 

Before the local food feast, members of the Indigenous Solidarity Working Group facilitated a learning circle. This was a powerful exploration of our relationship with the land and water close to where we live, how colonialism has benefited my people, how I have been impacted by colonialism, and imagining what a food system 50 years from now looks like when we are in good relationship with land and water. The connections and conversations with the people at my table continue beyond the convention.

NFU has several active committees and working groups. I am joining the Farmland Access and Action Committee, as well as the International Programs Committee that stewards the Indigenous Solidarity Working Group and Migrant Worker Solidarity Working Group. Stay tuned to learn more about Organic BC’s participation in the NFU.

The NFU Region 8 serves BC and is actively recruiting new members. It’s already very active on BIPOC and Indigenous issues.


Michelle Tsutsumi grows food in Secwepemculecw at Golden Ears Farm with a lot of support from family and friends. She is a facilitator, focusing on Cultivating Safe Spaces and sociocracy to build in practices that allow us to listen deeply so that we can make decisions from a place of safety, connectedness, and belonging.

Featured image: Brian MacIsaac, Rebecca Kneen, Michelle Tsutsumi, and Jamie Kneen at the NFU Convention. Credit: Jamie Kneen.

Revision of the Canadian Organic Standards

in 2024/Organic Community/Organic Standards/Standards Updates/Winter 2024

By Nicolas Walser

It’s that time again: the review of the Canadian Organic Standards!

Every five years, the Canadian Organic Standards undergo a revision and an updated version is published. Organic standards need to evolve to address emerging challenges, technological advancements, and scientific research. The last revision was published in 2020—always be sure you are referring to the most up-to-date version.

You may be asking, “If revisions occur every five years, don’t we have some time before the 2025 version?” The reality is that updating the standards is quite a lengthy process and requires input from many stakeholders.

The Canadian Organic Standards are held by the Canadian General Standards Board (CGSB) and maintained by the Organic Federation of Canada (OFC) but are ultimately “owned by the public.” This means that it is the public and industry, not the government, who gets to make and set the standards. So, anyone can be involved in the revision process.

The revision process is spearheaded by the OFC, starting by receiving proposals from the public; this began in July 2023, and 290 proposals have been received. OFC then convenes seven Working Groups to discuss the proposals, each focused on a specific area of organic production (crops, livestock, etc). Each Working Group is made up of 15 members and contains numerous producers, as well as consultants, organic stakeholders, and at least one verification officer or representative of a certifying body.

Within a Working Group there are Task Forces made up of specialists and focused on specific areas of the standards, such as poultry or mushrooms. They discuss proposals in great detail and bring their recommendations to the larger Working Group.

After the Working Groups have assessed the proposals and come to a consensus, their recommendations are sent to the CGSB’s Technical Committee on Organic Agriculture. The Technical Committee is made up of volunteers who represent organizations from across Canada, including industry groups and provincial associations. There are voting and non-voting members; non-voting members provide input and technical expertise but are unable to vote on the adoption of the standards. Once the Technical Committee has made its decisions the new draft standards will be opened up for public comment in 2025.

Organic BC has the privilege to be a voting member of the Technical Committee. This is a very exciting opportunity for our organization to have a seat at the national table. As the first province in Canada to have had a provincial organic standard—the BC Certified Organic Program was created in 1993 and was foundational to the creation of the National Standard—we have lots to offer the rest of the country.

Involvement in the revision process allows Organic BC to contribute to the development of standards that not only meet regulatory requirements but also enhance consumer trust in the authenticity and integrity of organic products. Organic BC will be able to contribute valuable insights on how the standards can be adapted to better suit the specific conditions of BC’s unique and diverse organic sector. BC requires a set of standards which are robust and empower our producers to continue in our mission “To cultivate a resilient organic movement in British Columbia.”

I am very excited to be able to represent Organic BC on the Technical Committee. I don’t take this responsibility lightly, as our industry relies on these standards. Organic BC’s executive director, Eva-Lena Lang, and I will be having regular meetings throughout the revision process to ensure that our votes align with the needs of the organic community in BC. I encourage everyone to review the 290 proposals that have been submitted for consideration for the revisions.

Each proposal will have to be assessed and discussed, which is why the revision process takes such a long time. This rigorous process relies on many volunteers contributing a significant amount of effort to ensure that the standards continue to be robust and reflect IFOAM Organics International’s Principles of Organics (Health, Ecology, Fairness, Care).

I am looking forward to undergoing this work in a manner that fosters collaboration and ensures that the standards are developed through a consultative and inclusive approach, taking into account the perspectives of our various stakeholders.

Your input is crucial throughout this process, both now in reviewing the proposals, and later, when the draft is released for public comments. The sooner we have your input, the more time we will have to devote to ensure that the revisions reflect the needs of our community.

You can view the proposals at the Organic Federation of Canada website:

If you have comments on any of the proposals, please share your feedback with Organic BC by emailing info@organicbc.org.


Nicolas Walser (he/him) is an agrologist who lives and grows in unceded Ktunaxa territory with his family. A seed saver, wetland enthusiast and policy nerd he sits on Organic BC’s Accreditation Board and the Central Kootenay Food Policy Council.

Featured image: Peppers ripening at Northstar Organics. Credit: Maylies Lang.

1 2 3 26
Go to Top